Napster And Musician Rights

Music copyright is something that volition always be in question. Many pot believe that euphony is for tout ensemble to hear and should not be restricted on how we invite it. Napster is the greatest controversy in the United States at current. Many melodyians and mountain believe others should move over free advance to all music. Music is an face of feelings and it is an art, And art is something that is there for others to observe whether it is by looking at it with their look or listening to it with their ears.We can go into a museum and view a painting freely why should we not be allowed to listen to music freely although it is air over the radio. Unrestricted glide slope to music allows hatful to more readily know what music they prefer and appeals to them. The program Napster allows large number to find music listen to it and find out what mechanic sings a subprogramicular song and listen to it. Then many of those slew go out and purchase those CDs which makes m oney for those bands.Free access to music allows knowledge of unused bands to become more wide lot and can increase the circulation and popularity of a song and a band. Napster creates an environment that allows people all over America to share their music with others This is no contrasting from someone copying a CD for a friend so they can have it still no one can arrest that just because Napster it nationwide record companies loss to control it.Many written text artist state that they are losing money because of Internet programs such as Napster. This statement made by the band Metallica states the feelings of many recording artist From day one our fight has always been to protect the rights of artists who chose not to have their music exploited without consent.The courts decision validates this right and confirms that Napster was terms in taking not only Metallicas music but other artists who do not want to be a part of the Napster system and exploiting it without their a pproval. We have never objected to the technology, the Internet or the digital dispersal of music. All we have ever asked is that artists be able to control how, when and in what form their creativity is distributed through these channels.These are some of the basic rights that Napster has continually refused to accept. Many musical artist feel that they are being cheated because people are not paying to listen to their music. Just like a poem some songs are not meant for the world to hear and Napster puts songs all over America available at the click of a button. Although Napster does strain music to be accessed by anyone it does not censor children from accessing music that contains lyrics not appropriate for them. Altough parents should be responsible for obtaining programs or viewing what their children are accessing online.As a musical artist myself I believe that everyone should have access to all music at no cost but if you want to have that music on such as a CD you shoul d have to pay for the artist time and effort put into do that CD you wouldnt goto work everyday if you didnt get paid. Napster excessively allows people for all over the nation to share and introduce others to new music and who has the right to restrict the freedom and ideas of an individual who is trying to deport themselves. Napster is something that will always be in controversy as large as it exist but who will make the final decision.