Relationships and Human Behavior Perspectives Essay

Reviewing mankind appearances from diametric perspectives, including the five main perspectives of biologic, study, mixer and cultural, cognitive, and psychodynamic influences, can fewtimes shed light on wherefore humans act the way they do. Using these perspectives to review how human relationships pose, bring, and be keep can provide a deeper understanding and context of this phenomenon. Framing make love relationships with these different perspectives also helps to show how the perspectives themselves differ or are corresponding in relation to how they consider relationships as being formed and fight backed.The biological perspective contends that subjective causes drive human behavior. Specifically, this perspective states that the actions of the nervous musical arrangement and genetic heredity drive to different casings of behavior (McLeod, 2007). From this perspective, hormonal reactions and feelings of documentation in the brain that are associated with a particular man-to-man lead people to start relationships (McLeod, 2007). Additionally, the relationship is maintained because humans have an innate lust to reproduce and pass their own genetic material on to their offspring, and in order to drive this urge, the brain continues to trigger feelings of pleasure and hormonal releases to strengthen the association between a given somebody and dependable feelings (McLeod, 2007). This perspective is somewhat unique from the other superstars in how it views relationships, because it claims that advanced cognitive processes are not regular(a) necessary for a relationship to expire instead, only biochemical processes are required.The next type of perspective, the turn backing perspective, claims that learning through association leads to specific behaviors, and that individuals will generally learn to ordain behaviors that they see are reciprocateed (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). From this perspective, humans form relationships because they see other relationships, such as those of their parents, externally rewarded, and come to associate the notion of love with reward. The rewards that one receives from a relationship, such as attention, compassion, or even financial security, are associated with love over time, which strengthens the relationship and makes people more likely tomaintain a relationship after they have been involved in it for some time (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013).Like the biological perspective, the learning perspective deems relationship behavior as something beyond humans conscious control and does not ineluctably require conscious thought, although the learning perspective does not claim to bang the internal processes that drive it, and it does require that humans have at least the ability to learn in order for them to be involved in relationships (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). loving and cultural perspectives claim that humans are ingrained with what constitutes right(a) behavior through social ization. Because people grow up, in many cases, in households with married parents, or at least where the parents date other individuals, baby birdren learn early on that relationships are not only acceptable, but rattling desirable (McLeod, 2007). This notion is progress reinforced through messages given to the child through the media, their friends and other family members, and most people they come in partake with, all of whom deem love to be one of the highest goals a soulfulness can achieve.Individuals therefore seek out relationships in their teen long time because they have been told that it is a positive objective to strive toward, and they are further reinforced in their views by their partner and others who know them after go out or getting married, which leads the mortal to continue their relationship (McLeod, 2007). This perspective is remote the learning and biological perspectives in that it does not rely on reflexes or innate drives, but instead requires compl ex thought, and, moreover, socialization a person living outside of society would likely have no desire to be in a relationship, according to this perspective.The cognitive perspective claims that human thought is what drives all behavior. In this sense, then, humans enter relationships because they see relationships as something that they desire, and which will provide them with some type of enjoyment or reward for seeking out (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). If they find that they do receive some type of benefit from dating a person, they will make the decision to develop the relationship further, learning more about the person and perhaps even getting married, if they believe that they are sufficiently compatible with the other person for therelationship to last and continue to be rewarding (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). This perspective, like the social and cultural perspective, is very reliant on human thought as a driver of relationships, but the cognitive perspective deems relationsh ips an individual prize rather than a result of societal pressure.Lastly, the psychodynamic perspective contends that behavior is due to interactions between the conscious and the subconscious mind. A relationship might begin because a member of the opposite sex might remind an individual of the loving relationship they had with their parents, but in order to sublimate the distant desire for ones parents, the individual seeks out a relationship with a person outside of their family. The relationship is maintained because it provides the person with self-importance fulfillment (McLeod, 2007).Like the cognitive and social perspectives, the psychodynamic perspective describes relationships in impairment of human thought and cognitive activity, but unlike those other perspectives, the psychodynamic mentality believes that humans are essentially bound to enter into relationships, because it ascribes the behavior to innate drives. In this sense, the psychodynamic perspective is some what like the biological perspective. All of these different perspectives, then, can provide different types of insight into human relationships.ReferencesMcLeod, S. (2007). Psychology Perspectives. Retrieved from http//www.simplypsychology.org/ Mikkelson, A. C., & Pauley, P. M. (2013). maximizing Relationship Possibilities Relational Maximization in Romantic Relationships. Journal Of Social Psychology, 153(4), 467-485. doi10.1080/00224545.2013.767776