How does steinbeck portray George, hero or villian? Essay

Of Mice and Men is based on the major themes of hard reality, inhalations, companionship and calamity particularly relevant to 1930s America, following the depression and frugal pauperism it caused. Steinbeck portrays George as a blemished character who doesnt display prototypical heroic qualities, however the reader realizes with him. Steinbeck therefore ultimately presents him as a anti-hero within the context of the narrative. At the drawning of the novel, Steinbeck portrays George as a flawed character. George and lennie travel to a ranch , indicating the unsettled lifestyle of men during 1930s. originally arriving at the ranch, George loss his inure with lennie morosely implying bad temper and unsociability, and by chance emphasising Georges villainous side. another perspective may be the wee-wee up of Georges anger, due to complications in weed. Steinbeck implies this using the word restless. The angry language heightens Georges villainous attri neverthelesses, comb ined with adverbs explodes and snapped, increasing the readers confusion approximately George although they empathize with his hardships faced by staying with Lennie However, these hardships are questioned by his actions later in the novel.Georges consanguinity with lennie conveys his character as a anti-hero, however this doesnt highlight his privation of conventional heroic attributes. Lennies portrayed as protective towards George nil hurts George Lennie growled. Nonetheless, this juxtaposition intensifies the oppose between the pair. Perhaps Steinbeck uses this to intrigue the reader about the dynamics of their relationship, heightening the human side of George and allowing the reader to empathize with George under the circumstances.Steinbeck describes George as having sharp strong features due to his work as a itinerant migrant worker during the US depression. However, the reader may begin to question if Steinbeck is using the adjectives to describe Georges physical appea rance, or his strong character. notwithstanding this, Georges most heroic quality is his intense care for others, specifically Lennie, where the reader observes the complexities of their companionship. I never seen one guy take so much trouble for another Steinbeck allows the reader to notice Georges kinder human characteristics.On the other hand, Steinbeck uses the adverbs morosely the negative language empathises Georges villainous side. Additionally, Steinbeck uses the verbs snapped and glared to present George as harsh and sharp. Combined with harshly and briskly the readers ambiguous reaction towards George is increased, and many sense of heroism is lost. the loss is intensified towards the end of the novel. In stock to George, Steinbeck describes lennie as patient. juxtaposing Lennies innocence with Georges frustration.Despite this George looks ashamedly , which contrasts against his temper heightens his human characteristics compared with lennie anguished face. ** However this confuses the reader about Georges sense towards Lennies, making the reader question whether Georges a hero or villain. The share of dreams is the most powerful symbol in the novel, representing the possibility of self-reliance and freedom. Steinbeck presents George as inventor of the dream, therefore his heroic attributes incur visible. Steinbeck conveys George as essentially defend other characters from the cruelties of the world.Additionally, Steinbeck portrays George as an inspirational welcoming character, as George allows candy and crocks to buzz off bemused by the beauty of the dream. However this heightens their desperation and loneliness but also the trust and reliance they have in George. Even though each character subconsciously knows the dreams a unrealistic goal, they are stable amazed. George spoke reverently conveys his deep respects and awe towards the dream, some as if it was sacred. This could connect to his surname Milton reference to paradises lost a 1930s poem about the destruction of a perfect place.here, Steinbeck heightens his human attributes. maybe another perspective could be that George allowed the character to dream falsely as he knew the dream wasnt achievable. in the context of 1930s economic situation, maybe he knew theyd never do her and he hold as Lennie usta like to hear about it. on the other hand, the dream may have been created for Georges benefit and selfishness. Therefore, through with(predicate) Georges dream Steinbeck highlights twain heroic and potentially villainous attributes of his character.In the last scene, George murders lennie not through an evil intention but a mercy killing. Steinbeck creates a riddle as George intends to kill lennie however George portrays being cruel to be kind. Steinbecks presentation of Georges internal conflict is finally resolved. The reader observes that the Curley will r tied(p)ge lennie brutally and slowly shoot for his guts. Therefore the reader empathises with Geo rge, as he makes a conflicted decision between two actions. In contrast to George, Steinbeck portrays Curley as an archetypal villain. Curley is described as terrier.the malicious language elevates his villainous traits above Georges. combined with the adverbs lashed and harsh the readers negative reactions towards Curley heighten, as theyre uneffective to trust Curley, instead they feel a sense of alert and accent when hes around. therefore, when comparing George and Curley, George villainous qualities decrease and his heroic actions become more visible. Despite Georges complaints about lennie, he feels a brotherly connexion with Lennie because Lennie provides an escape form loneliness of a migrant workers who are the loneliest guys in the world.However, an alternative perspective that heighten George heroism, is that perhaps George killed lennie, as he realised Lennie was a danger to society. Overall, the reader witnesses the depth of the sacrifice George made, even though it s hattered is own dreams, strengthening the readers empathy towards George. Despite this the reader is futile to forgive Georges actions. This concludes Steinbeck as portraying George as a conflicting character, an anti-hero.