Linguistic Reclamation of “Queer” Essay -- Social Issues, Discriminati

Linguistic refilling is a cultural process of removing detestfulness from a term that is utilise negatively and oppressively by a dominant culture (out-group) against a specific, less powerful group (in-group). In the article A poove Revolution Reconceptualizing the Debate Over Linguistic Reclamation, the author, Robin Brontsema explores the reclamation of the article hassock and opposite related hateful speech intended to disenable its target from trey different perspectives that are based on three identifiable goals neutralization of the word, its value reversal, and stigma exploitation (46, 52). According to the first perspective, the pejoration or hate is inborn from the detestable word, which implies that reclaiming the word would do no good instead, omitting the word from language, if possible, allow for take care of the pain ca determinationd by the word (Brontsema 49). The supporters of the second perspective, on the other hand, believe that pejoration is sepa rable from the vengeful word, and thus, reclamation of that word is supported (Brontsema 51). Finally, the third perspective believers, stressing that hate is inseparable from the word, support its reclamation because they believe that a revolutionary call that starkly obligates the out-group to accept the in-group for what it stands for can help in reversing the negativity of the word (Brontsema 52, 53). The field of reclamation is more complex than bingle theorises because words that carry hate are dangerous to play with. As Jeane Kirkpatrick, the 16th US embassador and an ardent anticommunist, once said, Words can destroy. What we call each other ultimately becomes what we think of each other, and it matters (ncvs.org). Words that are powerful and puddle the abi... ...anguage. They do not keep in mind that neutralizing queer will not neutralize the words related to queer automatically in fact, the related words may recreate the original, hateful queer. Furthermore, t hose who think that hate is removable from queer are mostly young, and have not faced the real pain inflicted by the word in the past. On the other side of spectrum, some think that the in-group (homosexuals) must create a revolution against the out-group by using the power of hate that queer contains in order to force the authoritarian group to stop using queer in an abusive way. However, homosexuals may not be successful in changing the faith of others because faith cannot be forcefully determined. In the end, one can definitely say that reclamation of queer is of no use because the hate associated with queer only dies if the word queer dies.